There are a couple of elephants-in-the-parlour willfully, even aggressively ignored in all of these climate doomsday musings. Maybe three altogether.
First is the false ‘consensus’ of ‘97% of scientists agree that anthropogenic influences are dominating the changing climate. This is not a good representation of actual breadth of research and observation. The questionnaire was devised with the intent of fudging responses such that the desired aim was met, climate research is only funded when its focus is on supporting this narrative. Scientists who disagree with good data are attacked and their reputations smeared with all manner of logically fallacious means, from ad hominem to guilt by association and on in a widely promoted effort by elitist bodies.
Second, the only place one will find ‘indications’ of future doom due to atmospheric carbon is in computer models. There is no such signal in the real data, the un-“adjusted” data, which has now been collected over the decades these model’s predictions have been trumpeted hither and yon. None of the predictions have come about thus far. Dr. John Christy probably lays that out in the most accessible fashion. Third, the effects of the rapidly waning planetary magnetic shield are ignored, the massive changes on other solar system planets are only discussed in rarified circles, well documented and ongoing. The changes in the dynamics of the system and increases in cosmic radiation reaching our planet’s surface due to earths weakening magnetic field is not being acknowledged in the popular press and popular ‘science.’
Our planet has tolerated much higher levels of atmospheric carbon. The more CO2, the healthier and more flourishing is all plant life.
There is a dark appetite being encouraged by powerful groups who appear to want less consciousness and fewer people.
This is not new, but with billions to spend and legacy mass media effectively captured (owned) by these mega wealthy groups and their aspirants, the appetite for horrid fantasies of what is to come due to human presence and activity and the consequent intended infighting and such anti human screeds as the above mentioned is saddening to put it mildly.
The whole solar system is undergoing an immense event in cosmological slow motion in large part due to an electromagnetic phenomena which is part of our galaxy’s natural cycle. See: “galactic current sheet” if you feel able to confront incomprehensibly massive forces and cycles.
Learning about logical fallacies and noting how widespread their use in multiple levels of popular and government discourse is highly recommended.
Computer models only look at what their creators understand and want to examine. The nearly 100% failure rate of these models to predict climate over the decades is awesome. Or awful, as when applied by policy makers and swept up gleefully by activists and shallow thinkers.
This problem is not isolated to the climate propaganda. I wish I could say debate, but debates are not possible when people refuse to allow dissenting data to be discussed.
This is the real tragedy, and as the scientism continues, decisions are made which indeed will be and are now disastrous
There are a couple of elephants-in-the-parlour willfully, even aggressively ignored in all of these climate doomsday musings. Maybe three altogether.
First is the false ‘consensus’ of ‘97% of scientists agree that anthropogenic influences are dominating the changing climate. This is not a good representation of actual breadth of research and observation. The questionnaire was devised with the intent of fudging responses such that the desired aim was met, climate research is only funded when its focus is on supporting this narrative. Scientists who disagree with good data are attacked and their reputations smeared with all manner of logically fallacious means, from ad hominem to guilt by association and on in a widely promoted effort by elitist bodies.
Second, the only place one will find ‘indications’ of future doom due to atmospheric carbon is in computer models. There is no such signal in the real data, the un-“adjusted” data, which has now been collected over the decades these model’s predictions have been trumpeted hither and yon. None of the predictions have come about thus far. Dr. John Christy probably lays that out in the most accessible fashion. Third, the effects of the rapidly waning planetary magnetic shield are ignored, the massive changes on other solar system planets are only discussed in rarified circles, well documented and ongoing. The changes in the dynamics of the system and increases in cosmic radiation reaching our planet’s surface due to earths weakening magnetic field is not being acknowledged in the popular press and popular ‘science.’
Our planet has tolerated much higher levels of atmospheric carbon. The more CO2, the healthier and more flourishing is all plant life.
There is a dark appetite being encouraged by powerful groups who appear to want less consciousness and fewer people.
This is not new, but with billions to spend and legacy mass media effectively captured (owned) by these mega wealthy groups and their aspirants, the appetite for horrid fantasies of what is to come due to human presence and activity and the consequent intended infighting and such anti human screeds as the above mentioned is saddening to put it mildly.
The whole solar system is undergoing an immense event in cosmological slow motion in large part due to an electromagnetic phenomena which is part of our galaxy’s natural cycle. See: “galactic current sheet” if you feel able to confront incomprehensibly massive forces and cycles.
Learning about logical fallacies and noting how widespread their use in multiple levels of popular and government discourse is highly recommended.
Computer models only look at what their creators understand and want to examine. The nearly 100% failure rate of these models to predict climate over the decades is awesome. Or awful, as when applied by policy makers and swept up gleefully by activists and shallow thinkers.
This problem is not isolated to the climate propaganda. I wish I could say debate, but debates are not possible when people refuse to allow dissenting data to be discussed.
This is the real tragedy, and as the scientism continues, decisions are made which indeed will be and are now disastrous
Thanks for bring this topic forward.