Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Thomas Neuburger's avatar

Thanks, Robert and David, for your perspectives. First, about Cadwalladr, I'm not endorsing all of her views or actions, simply the perspective she provides on high-tech autocracy, which is both real and ascendant. She wields a valuable spotlight

About the question — who's the big dog, corps or the nominal state? — my point is that in large, it doesn't matter. There is a State with consolidated control in most of the world today. Its components vary, and that's interesting, but not the main point. The State exists, whatever pieces it has. Women and men are its subjects. It can be kinder (see the US in 1955) or rough. But state structures are always limiting, and always benefit the Few by placing the Many into unwilling, or semi-willing, service. I probably should have made that more clear.

These comments are welcome though, considered and interesting. Thanks for offering them.

Ngungu's avatar

Carole has undoubtedly been doing formidable investigative journalism, but I am somewhat surprised by her being upset about 300 journalists fired from The Washington Post – https://broligarchy.substack.com/p/fight

After all, isn't the WP a CIA mouthpiece?

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?