An American Coup?
'No dice, Mr President. No dice on Ukraine and no dice on Gaza. We're in charge now.'
Update: A comment before we begin. Col. Lawrence Wilkerson is well placed to “hear things” in the same way that Gen. Wesley Clark was well placed to “hear things.”
Does that make Wilkerson and his "pretty reliable sources" right? No. But it's definitely news that he said it.
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy
—U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 2
I found the following news via a piece at Ian Welsh’s site, and it struck me as important. While I don’t want to overplay what it implies, I don’t want to underplay it either.
An American Coup?
In a 30-minute interview with Judge Napolitano on September 18, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell and critic of America’s wars, described a recent event in which Pentagon chief Gen. Lloyd Austin told President Biden that, in Wilkerson’s words, “the Pentagon has taken over, essentially, diplomacy as well as any action, militarily speaking, with regard to both theaters of war,” meaning Ukraine and Israel.
Wilkerson added, “And so they're now in charge.” Austin, according to this telling, listened “to the people in the bowels of the Pentagon who know the truth” and forced the President to back down.
Biden was furious, we’re told, but “took that advice.” Except, as Wilkerson tells it, it wasn’t advice, but instruction. “No dice,” as Wilkerson characterized the message, sounds pretty final.
This is good news and bad news. The good, U.S. policy is now:
To Netanyahu, if you invade Lebanon or attack Iran, you’re on your own.
To Zelenskyy, no to long range missiles reaching deep into Russia.
So we and the world are safer, at least for a while.
The bad: Is this a coup? Has the military stood up to the President, forced him to change policy?
If the answers are yes, we’re on our way once more to revising the Constitution-as-practiced. Both political parties have already confirmed that the Fourth Amendment can be ignored. That’s now the “new normal.” So what’s this encroachment of the Pentagon into foreign policy, if not another “new normal”? Has MacArthur finally won?
Whatever the truth, you won’t see this reported in what people call the “news,” but I doubt Wilkerson’s sources are wrong. At any rate, we’ll know soon enough by the way Zelenskyy and Netanyahu act.
Welcome to the future of U.S. foreign policy.
The Wilkerson Exchange in Full
The video at the top contains the full Wilkerson interview, cued to start at the conversation about Austin and Biden. I’ve also printed that exchange below, lightly edited. Emphasis is that of the speaker.
Wilkerson: I think what we’re seeing here is another attempt, because a 100-plane strike didn’t do it, by Netanyahu to provoke Hezbollah to some sort of action that he can then declare is warlike to the extent that he can do what he wants to do with them — even though I’m told with great confidence in the sources that the latest two visits by the Central Command Unified Commander were to tell him [Netanyahu] that we would not be with him in the event of his going to war with Hezbollah that he provoked. Nor will we be with him going to war with Iran that he provoked. And we made it quite clear that we would know if he provoked it.
Napolitano: You're speaking of General Kurilla [CENTCOM commander since April 2022].
Wilkerson: Yes. Yes.
Napolitano: So Scott Ritter agrees with you, Doug Macgregor says he can’t imagine Austin and Blinkin letting General Kuralla do that. It’s very very interesting. ... Is this speculation on your part or is it based on sources?
Wilkerson: It’s based on some pretty reliable sources. And here’s the bigger picture and I hope the others told you this too. Biden’s fury — and you could see it — he was seething when he met with the British Prime Minister.
Napolitano: Yes, yes, we have that clip. He was out of control with anger.
Wilkerson: And what he [had] just been told, apparently, was by the Pentagon, “No dice, Mr President. No dice on Ukraine and no dice on Gaza. We're in charge now.”
Napolitano: No dice. You're talking about no dice on the long range missiles reaching deep into Russia, even though Tony Blinkin had intimated all week in Kyiv with his British counterpart that this was happening. And Sir Keir Stormer, the British Prime Minister, had every reason to believe as he’s flying across the Atlantic that Joe Biden’s answer would be yes.
Wilkerson: He was embarrassed. He was embarrassed by the fact — he was pulling out his maps with target data and Biden told him, “Don’t even pull them out. We’re not going to talk about that.”
I’ve been told, again by fairly reliable sources, that Blinkin and Sullivan — Blinkin primarily, but Sullivan too — have been sidetracked, and what’s happened is the Pentagon has taken over, essentially, diplomacy as well as any action, militarily speaking, with regard to both theaters of war.
And so they’re now in charge.
I have to change my evaluation of Secretary Austin if that’s the case, because it means he listened finally to the people in the bowels of the Pentagon who know the truth, and he’s reacting to that, and he’s told the President Biden that, and to Biden’s credit, even though he was furious, he finally took that advice.
Napolitano: Colonel, you once ran the State Department [as Secretary Colin Powell’s chief of staff under George Bush]. How does the Defense Department engage in diplomacy?
Wilkerson: They engage in diplomacy every day. Every day. There are four-stars in the various syncdoms, the regions that they control, the AORs [Areas of Responsibility] [who] are the true U.S. diplomats. And some of them are very good at it. I saw some of them. I worked with some of them who are very good at it, better than any Secretary of State.
But it shouldn’t be that way. That’s a parenthetical remark. We shouldn’t have the military leading diplomacy. But we often do.
And the Japanese prime minister once told me why to my face. He said, “Larry, when your East Asia and Pacific Assistant Secretary comes out here, he’s not got anything but his briefcase. When the man from Honolulu comes out here, from Camp Smith in Hawaii, he’s towing air wings, submarines, battle groups, Marine amphibious groups, Army divisions. I listened to him. This is the Prime Minister of Japan.
Napolitano: Who told General Kurilla to tell Prime Minister Netanyahu, “If you invade Lebanon, you’re on your own?”
Wilkerson: It was, I think, Austin. But that’s the chain of command. Austin conveyed that message to him [Kurilla]. But I think it was Austin that convinced Biden to give him that command so he could transmit it to Kurilla.
Thanks, all, for a fruitful discussion!
At the moment I'm chasing down related comments by Scott Ritter regarding Biden telling Starmer to stand down. If true, it starts to fill in the event from the Biden side Short version: Ritter thinks the US nearly started a nuclear war, but avoided it. Stay tuned.
Of course, none of this could be true, or rather, none of it could be accurately characterized. But it does seem to paint a picture of Biden-Starmer saying to themselves, "Putin is bluffing," then authorizing deep-into-Russia strikes by Ukrainian missiles (which the US and UK would have to help manage), then — somehow — deciding to stand down. What caused that decision?
More to come? Not sure, but I'm looking.
Thomas
Scott Ritter update
The only source I found for Ritter's comments is here:
https://archive.is/J5x0K (Consortium News)
Unfortunately he doesn't offer sources for statements like these:
> [Russian ambassador to the US Anatoly] Antonov’s sentiments [see * below] were likely echoed through existing back-channel communications used by the Department of Defense and the C.I.A.
> In the end, the message got through — Biden pulled back from giving Ukraine the permissions it sought.
So I don't think I can carry this further without confirmation from someone other than Wilkerson.
Thomas
* Antonov's statement was “if there is a conflict, it will not spread to the territory of the United States of America. I am constantly trying to convey to them one thesis that the Americans will not be able to sit it out behind the waters of this ocean. This war will affect everyone, so we constantly say – do not play with this rhetoric.”