Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Thomas Neuburger's avatar

Thanks, all, for a fruitful discussion!

At the moment I'm chasing down related comments by Scott Ritter regarding Biden telling Starmer to stand down. If true, it starts to fill in the event from the Biden side Short version: Ritter thinks the US nearly started a nuclear war, but avoided it. Stay tuned.

Of course, none of this could be true, or rather, none of it could be accurately characterized. But it does seem to paint a picture of Biden-Starmer saying to themselves, "Putin is bluffing," then authorizing deep-into-Russia strikes by Ukrainian missiles (which the US and UK would have to help manage), then — somehow — deciding to stand down. What caused that decision?

More to come? Not sure, but I'm looking.

Thomas

Expand full comment
Thomas Neuburger's avatar

Scott Ritter update

The only source I found for Ritter's comments is here:

https://archive.is/J5x0K (Consortium News)

Unfortunately he doesn't offer sources for statements like these:

> [Russian ambassador to the US Anatoly] Antonov’s sentiments [see * below] were likely echoed through existing back-channel communications used by the Department of Defense and the C.I.A.

> In the end, the message got through — Biden pulled back from giving Ukraine the permissions it sought.

So I don't think I can carry this further without confirmation from someone other than Wilkerson.

Thomas

* Antonov's statement was “if there is a conflict, it will not spread to the territory of the United States of America. I am constantly trying to convey to them one thesis that the Americans will not be able to sit it out behind the waters of this ocean. This war will affect everyone, so we constantly say – do not play with this rhetoric.”

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts